call us now! +8618221755073
[email protected]
Shanghai, China.

IP Address Lookup | Geolocation

The Geolocation lookup tool provided on this page is an estimate of where the IP address may be located. The data come from a few IP-Based Geolocation providers, and their accuracy varies depending on how quickly they update their database when changes occur.

Үнийн санал авах

Grant v Australian Knitting Mills

Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1] is a landmark case in consumer and negligence law from 1935, holding that where a manufacturer knows that a consumer may be injured if the manufacturer does not take reasonable care, the manufacturer owes a duty to the consumer to take that reasonable care. It continues to be cited as an authority in legal cases, [2] and used …

Үнийн санал авах

Metal Trades Employers Association v Amalgamated Engineering Union

Metal Trades Employers Association v Amalgamated Engineering Union (1935) 54 CLR 387 . This case considered the conciliation and arbitration power of the Commonwealth and whether or not the Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration could make a binding award upon employers who employed non-union members.

Үнийн санал авах

Elliott v The Commonwealth

[1936] HCA 7; 54 CLR 657. Date: 06 March 1936: Cited by: 12 cases Legislation cited: 5 provisions Cases cited: 29 cases BarNet publication information ...

Үнийн санал авах

VirusTotal

Analyse suspicious files, domains, IPs and URLs to detect malware and other breaches, automatically share them with the security community.

Үнийн санал авах

In Grant v Australian Knitting Mills (1935) 54 CLR

The PC held that the decision of the Supreme Court of South Australia was correct in finding that both the manufacturer, Australian Knitting Mills, and the retailer, James Martin.

Үнийн санал авах

Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Co …

Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd; [1920] HCA 54 - Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd (31 August 1920); [1920] HCA 54 (31 August 1920); 28 CLR 129; 7 App Cas 829; 16 CAR 231; [1920] 26 ALR 337

Үнийн санал авах

Mathway | Basic Math Problem Solver

Free math problem solver answers your homework questions with step-by-step explanations.

Үнийн санал авах

R v Brislan; Ex parte Williams

R v Brislan; Ex parte Williams; [1935] HCA 78 - R v Brislan; Ex parte Williams (17 December 1935); [1935] HCA 78 (17 December 1935); 54 CLR 262

Үнийн санал авах

MMW – Монгол ноосоор Дэлхийн чанарыг урлав

Эрхэм зорилго Чанарыг эрхэмлэж, Дэлхийд өрсөлдөхүйц утасны үйлдвэрлэлийг цогцлоож

Үнийн санал авах

bharat pulverising миллс ххк

bharat pulverising миллс ххк. laxmi pulverizing mills p ltd. laxmi pulverizer udaipur in Brazil - residentialpainters.co.za. laxmi pulverizing mills p ltd laxmi pulverizer udaipur in india - gnfemorg. ... pulverise: 1 v make into a powder by breaking up or cause to become dust Synonyms: powder, powderise, powderize, pulverize powderise ...

Үнийн санал авах

Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936] AC 85

Australian Knitting Mills and John Martin & Co. filed an appeal in the High Court, arguing that the duty to care articulated in the case of Donoghue v Stevenson, was limited to …

Үнийн санал авах

Latitude Longitude Data

Convert between latitude and longitude formats such as DD (Decimal Degrees), DMS (Degrees Minutes Seconds), DMM (Degrees Decimal Minutes).

Үнийн санал авах

Lang v James Morrison & Co Ltd

Lang v James Morrison & Co Ltd; [1911] HCA 49 - Lang v James Morrison & Co Ltd (27 September 1911); [1911] HCA 49 (27 September 1911); 13 CLR 1

Үнийн санал авах

Grant v Australian Knitting Mills explained

Grant v Australian Knitting Mills is a landmark case in consumer and negligence law from 1935, holding that where a manufacturer knows that a consumer may be injured if the manufacturer does not take reasonable care, the manufacturer owes a duty to the consumer to take that reasonable care. It continues to be cited as an authority in legal cases, and used as an …

Үнийн санал авах

RICHARD THOROLD GRANT V. AUSTRALIAN KNITTING …

On appeal the High Court of Australia set aside that judgment by a majority. Evatt J, dissented, and agreed with the Chief Justice. Of the majority, the reasoning of Dixon J., with whom …

Үнийн санал авах

Thompson v Palmer

[1933] HCA 61; 49 CLR 507; [1934] ALR 47. Date: 14 December 1933: Cited by: 340 cases Legislation cited: 3 provisions Cases cited: 56 cases ...

Үнийн санал авах

Daniels Corporation International Pty Ltd v Australian

Daniels Corporation International Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission; [2002] HCA 49 - Daniels Corporation International Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (07 November 2002); [2002] HCA 49 (07 November 2002) (Gleeson CJ,Gaudron, McHugh, Gummow, Kirby, Hayne and Callinan JJ); 213 CLR 543; 77 ALJR 40; …

Үнийн санал авах

THE AUSTRALIAN HIGH COURT AND SOCIAL FACTS: A …

This article discusses a content analysis study of SF in negligence cases in the Australian High Court. This study confirms that judges do refer to SF in their judicial reasoning and that SF …

Үнийн санал авах

Lustre Hosiery Ltd v York

Lustre Hosiery Ltd v York; [1935] HCA 71 - Lustre Hosiery Ltd v York (22 November 1935); [1935] HCA 71 (22 November 1935); 54 CLR 134

Үнийн санал авах

Stuart v The Queen

Date: 29 November 1974: Bench: McTiernan A.c.j., Menzies, Gibbs, Mason and Jacobs JJ: Cited by: 110 cases Legislation cited: 3 provisions

Үнийн санал авах

Furs Ltd v Tomkies

[1936] HCA 3; 54 CLR 583; 9 ALJ 419. Date: 13 February 1936: Cited by: 90 cases Legislation cited: 0 provisions Cases cited: 19 cases ...

Үнийн санал авах

In Grant v Australian Knitting Mills (1935) 54 CLR 49, the UK …

In Grant v Australian Knitting Mills (1935) 54 CLR 49, the UK Privy Council ('PC') upheld the appeal brought by the plaintiff concerning the decision of the High. Court of Australia. The PC …

Үнийн санал авах

Furs v Tomkies

Furs Ltd v Tomkies (1936) 54 CLR 583 FACTS. Furs Ltd carried on the business of processing furs for the manufacture of coats. Tomkies was its managing director and had special knowledge of the tanning, dyeing and dressing …

Үнийн санал авах

Elliott v Commonwealth (1936) 54 CLR 657

Elliott v Commonwealth (1936) 54 CLR 657 . This case considered the issue of the discrimination and preference and whether or not a licensing system for seamen offended section 99 of the Constitution by giving a preference to a state or a part of a state. Share this case study Like this case study. Elliott v Commonwealth (1936) 54 CLR 657 .

Үнийн санал авах

Amalgamated Zinc (De Bavay's) Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation

Amalgamated Zinc (De Bavay's) Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation; [1935] HCA 81 - Amalgamated Zinc (De Bavay's) Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (19 December 1935); [1935] HCA 81 (19 December 1935); 54 CLR 295; [1906] AC 452; [1905] 2 KB 350

Үнийн санал авах

Blyth Chemicals Ltd v Bushnell

[1933] HCA 8; 49 CLR 66. Date: 03 April 1933: Cited by: 305 cases Legislation cited: 0 provisions Cases cited: 9 cases BarNet publication information ...

Үнийн санал авах